Votekick Suggestion.

v0nndutchv0nndutch Posts: 652Member Intermediate
edited June 2017 English
image

Been playing a lot of games lately where a hacker joins and autokicks the whole game or waits until its past 5 rounds and then just OPKs. If you're nearly winning and near the end of the game you have to endure 8rounds of this hacker OPKing you. Ok, you can leave, but I don't I want the EXP.

Personally I think you should be able to votekick for every single round.
You shouldn't need 4 or more players to be able to trigger a votekick. I know it works on majority but if its only a 3vs3 and its on last rounds, you still need to kick a hacker. It ruins too many games.

I've played WarRock PH, You cannot votekick premium players.
This is a pretty good idea. It's rare that you'll come across a Premium player OPK'ing or using obvious hacks. I understand that you'll get the GPS, Cham, Aimbot users but they'll be caught by the GM's.

What I'm basically saying is,

  1. Kick with 3 or more players, not 4.
  2. Cannot votekick Premium users.
  3. Kick up until the end of the game.
  4. In BG you should be able to kick up until the end aswell, I know people will try and kick high score players so they lose there EXP but thats what this community needs to stop, we all need to work together.
Anybody got any thoughts on this?

Thanks.
WarRock Beta Player since 2006!
Mike

Comments

  • PonuryPonury Posts: 219Member Trainee
    1. I think min 4 ppl is ok. With 3 ppl needed to kick you would need only 2 votes. That would be a bad thing
    2. It's a feature in PH WR, but you can buy 3day premium for only 1.2 eu. I think that would be a little to op ...
    3. Yup
    4. Yup

    I think that a good solution would be adding vote kick by room master. He could vote kick anyone from room and both teams will vote. 75% of votes = kick or something like that.
    Playing War Rock since 04/2007
  • linkinxerolinkinxero Posts: 174Member Trainee
    I personally appreciate the no-kick time at the end of a match. It's at the point where no other player can join even if there is a spot in the room. Before this change was made, there was so much abuse about "fun kicks" where a legit player is kicked by the room for the hell of it. And all it takes is one guy to be an ass and make the kick, and out of reflex everyone presses Y. I've explained before in threads for years why this kick format is bad for the community, and I'll have to migrate my thread over to Papaya sometime
    Killingtime
    Much needed features on a forum
    1. A spoiler tag or otherwise collapsible element.
    2. More flexible tabling.
    3. Not being forced to sign out.
    4. Quoting buttons.


    image
    image
  • v0nndutchv0nndutch Posts: 652Member Intermediate
    edited June 2017
    @Ponury

    If you're playing a 4vs4 but only 3 people are on your team and 1 of them is a hacker, wouldn't you want to votekick him?

    If Hackers are that sad to buy 3day premium to hack then they deserve a ban anyway

    Not a bad idea, but if you're a room and the teams are stacked they're going to kick you. That could be more hassle than its worth.

    --------

    @linkinxero

    I understand what you're saying but i've played a handful of games today where the hacker waits until you are unable to votekick him and then does what he needs to do. Completely runining the game for majority of the players.
    WarRock Beta Player since 2006!
    Mike
  • distortiondistortion Posts: 120Member Trainee
    Great idea!
    Agree with point 1.
    Point 2 would only work if we got rid of the 3d/7d/15d premium.
    Point 3 would imo be better if it was only the LAST round in CQC and the last 10 deaths in BG.

    I also think there should be a feature where you can easily report a hacker in-game (just like with CS:GO)
    If you right click on the enemy's name there should be an option to report with the options : suspicious and obvious. Abuse should be punished ofcourse with a temporarly ban.

  • v0nndutchv0nndutch Posts: 652Member Intermediate
    @distortion I was literally just thinking about the right click options. Think that would work really well if I'm honest, would be good if it would notify admins straight away if they're logged into WarRock.
    WarRock Beta Player since 2006!
    Mike
  • SirJuxSirJux Posts: 64Member Beginner
    Wouldn't need the change of system, if we just get rid of hackers. I suggest you to wait it out for a while and see if papaya gets it done or not.
    If they cant handle hackers properly, then the idea might come handy.
    Killingtime
  • PonuryPonury Posts: 219Member Trainee
    @v0nndutch
    Thats why I suggested vote kick by room master.
    Playing War Rock since 04/2007
  • v0nndutchv0nndutch Posts: 652Member Intermediate
    @Sirjux you will never get rid of hackers 100% you may get it down to 90% or something but you'll never get a "hack free game"

    WarRock Beta Player since 2006!
    Mike
  • SirJuxSirJux Posts: 64Member Beginner
    True, but atleast hackers are clearly visible and bannable. Votekicks from idiot players at last seconds of the game are far worse for the player who got kicked and you can literally do nothing against them. The kicked players time spent there had no use at all. I'd be pissed at hackers, but i'd be more pissed if my time spent at the game would just disappear.

    While if hacker starts opk at last minutes of the game he just gets additional deaths ( how many depends how fast he readys up himself), but gets the xp he had earned so far.

    Now when i think about it.....
    Maybe adding votekick until last second of the game would work, IF the xp isn't calculated at the end of the game, but during the game ( during each kill/flag and so on....)
    Killingtime
  • linkinxerolinkinxero Posts: 174Member Trainee
    Heck, exp/dinar can just be calculated at the moment you were kicked, assuming you were on the losing team. It can't be that hard to simulate that the match ended by time limit in any non-explosives mode and not giving you any winning team bonuses. And for explosives, just round the opposing team's round wins to the minimum necessary to beat yours (In a 9-win game, if the score is 4-3, and you're on the team with 4 points, the score is considered 4-5, as if the game was only a 5-win game. In a 9-win game, if the score is 5-3, and you're on the team with 5 points, the score is considered 5-7, as if the game was only a 7-win game.)
    Much needed features on a forum
    1. A spoiler tag or otherwise collapsible element.
    2. More flexible tabling.
    3. Not being forced to sign out.
    4. Quoting buttons.


    image
    image
  • zcoreyygzcoreyyg Posts: 0Member Beginner
    Agree with all of this - other than the premium one, should still be able to vote kick premium players otherwise the hackers would just go buy 3 days prem..

    Although I think there should be a system where multiple people have to votekick the premium player (right click his name) before the vote goes through to the Yes/NO  system. As that would make it harder for the hackers to auto kick to prevent themselves from getting removed from the game. 

    The new vote system was good when it was added but I think it's a bit of a joke that you cant kick someone past 5/6 rounds in a 7 or 9 round game. 

    Should definitely be able to kick people with less than 4 players though, 
  • N0HCH0N0HCH0 Posts: 390Member Trainee
    I have a premium for 1 year.
    Why does someone have the right to kick me out of the room?
    I bought this fucking game for my money.

  • KillingtimeKillingtime Posts: 246Member Trainee
    Don't agree with the op post, better just take care of the hackers properly. And because kicking people at the end of the game is just as bad as hackers runing the game like SirJux said, or like he said, unless you get the exp/dinar even when you get kicked, then its fine.

    And my suggestion regarding vote kick is to not be able to kick room masters, at least players with Supermaster, maybe even for just normal room master as well.
    SirJuxllfr4nll
Sign In or Register to comment.