Tournament mode for battle group.

Mrterr0rMrterr0r Posts: 244Member Trainee
Why does battle group not have a tournament mode?

Its unfair that CQC players have this option yet we in BG dont. 

20-players
Random teams
No rejoining < leave your locked out of room.
Random maps < every BG map included. 
Increased XP for players
F2P  < just lock out everything bar 1-4 slots. Meaning people can still use paid for weapons but everyone is limited to the same slots, stats, amount of weapons. and no P2W items.
P2W < everything goes. 
150 / 300 point games. 

And an event on this based on games played / won. 2 for a win, 1 for a loss. And 10 points needed to gain the event prize. 
Beta then 2007-2020

Comments

  • [HGM]Cheerful[HGM]Cheerful Posts: 427WR GM Intermediate
    Dear @Mrterr0r,

    We appreciate that you came up with a suggestion for Battle Group. However, there is something I am missing / I don't understand.

    For example, you want to have 20 players playing in tournament, but will this tournament be as the CQC one? 2vs2 matches or 10vs10? If it's 2vs2, then the match will definitely be too long and players will get bored, as well as if somebody starts to camp, they will ruin the match. Moreover, if it's a 10vs10 tournament, what would be the difference between this mode and a normal Battle Group room?

    Regards.
  • pedrocnppedrocnp Posts: 25Member Beginner
    The only way is a 32 player tournament with 4vs4 teams in small "BG" maps with different vehicles per map for different gameplay.

    But the game performance wouln't allow it xD
  • Mrterr0rMrterr0r Posts: 244Member Trainee
    @cheerful

    Not so much a tournament that CQC has as it works there due to map size and the type of game mode. 
    • 20 players so two teams of 10.
    Battlegroup players do not care about time! this is why the standard time for the majority of games is 40mins long. Back before the timer was introduced games regularly went over the hour mark for a single game. So we battle group players are not clock watching and XP farming. 

    What is the difference.

    •  Games wont start till there is 20 players. Not 2v1 like most. 
    • Maps are random after starting.
    • The teams are auto balanced.
    • Unable to rejoin the room if they leave. So stops the team-stacking. 
    • You could have a massive input to the weapons used.
    • Balanced teams, with balanced weapon load outs. 
    • Rewards which push players to partake in this. Its been shown before with events and XP players will play maps/modes that offer good rewards. 
    • 150 with 20 players should last around 30mins. While the 300 with 20 players would last about an hour. 
    • Level 20 and above. 
    • You could even set teams for the side, 2 heavys, 3 assults, 2 engineers, 2 medics, 1 sniper. ETC
    Camping happens now in normal games so what is the difference? Largely people camp because games are stitched up within the first 120 seconds of a game starting. Or by players (clan members) all joining one side mid game even with this auto balance the same IGNs end up stacked together. Bg games starting with two even teams of 8/10/16 are so much fun but this hardly if ever happens anymore. 

    • 2v1 then the 1 rejoins.
    • Lobby clans who flood one side while all being P2W having the most powerful items and weapons easily ruin games. 
    • Now lvl 100 players starting games vs 1-10s... You think this right?
    The above should show what would be different. Competitive, even teams across all of the Bg maps in game. Without the option to stack teams or rejoin... Log in ready up and play without the BS that this game offers in normal BG rooms. 

    This game suks and I have never played another game like this where stitching a game up is almost the going tactic. And this coming from players, some them having 11 years worth of play time, its pathetic. 

    Yet you do nothing about it. Not a single change to improve this game. Everything goes to CQC players. Tournament mode, new maps, new map option ak stealth. Events... BG has not had a single event yet. siege war is not a BG map < but this is what happens when you have biased admins. Count up CQC events to BG events. Then i ask why do you dismiss half the games community? 

    The way BG games are made and played out needs addressing. You have the chance to do something with a "tournament" type game mode without getting flack from changing the main Bg game. ( Even though it needs changing) Its core features are there and working in CQC already. Surly it would not be to hard to adjust it for BG use. Then make the rewards offered worth playing for and people will play.

    Sick of seeing the same IGNs stacked up, Same IGNs only playing 1 map / 1 side refusing to play anything else, The same IGNs who rejoin or leave coz they die. The same IGNs padding there 11 year old account on one made within the last 2 weeks. 

    Bg is a fun place to play but it gets ruined pretty quickly with some of the lame actions that happen. But this is not new its been bought up before yet head in sand time as no one takes any notice and the next update is a new shiny coloured weapon to buy rather then sort key areas of the game out.















    Beta then 2007-2020
  • Mrterr0rMrterr0r Posts: 244Member Trainee
    @[HGM]Cheerful 

    I hope you dont work in the ticket support section if it takes you this long to reply.

    Not interested in Bg as you favour CQC? 




    Beta then 2007-2020
Sign In or Register to comment.