Home › Uncharted Waters Online › General Discussion
Home › Uncharted Waters Online › General Discussion
Home › Uncharted Waters Online › General Discussion
Comments
- Director of new_world_company
Alt: Christopher_de_Haro, formerly William_Adams - temporary Deputy Director of new_world_company
Pay It Forward - It's what we do
Obviously that is not good for the game.
Let's hope that is not truly the situation.
And if it is then let's hope that things change.
We all want the best for the game in the long run.
But I will say one thing.
People here are blaming the moaners or snitches because some banning mistakes have happened. Now I do feel sad for Jose banned by mistake.
But to blame the snitches I think is unfair, the ones to blame are the ones who have abused the multi boxing.
If it was never abused in the first place this whole issue wouldn’t be a problem.
Ok maybe some would still accuse others, but it wouldn’t be on the scale it is now.
If there is unfair bannings it’s wrong, but the ones at fault are the abusers, not the complainers.
So, ask yourselves a question, since this system fail to bring justice to a 100%, and happen to jail innocent people, why we still implement it? Ask yourself why and you will understand.
So, do you prefer the "5 players in a house hold", or an entire world's gamers?
It is not a hard choice to make at all. It is clear and simple.
What you said was that if an innocent player happens to fleet someone who is running multis that you are PERFECTLY FINE with perma banning the entire fleet innocent one included because they are "expendable" just to see your dream of no alts? !?
If you ever fleet a shipbuilder for a mod and you come back the next day and see that you're permabanned for simply being in their fleet I don't want to hear even one complaint from you. In fact you should post a thank you letter in the forum to them since you're so " expendable ".
Papaya needs to be thorough in their investigation of EVERY PLAYER in the fleet or give warnings first. The if you are seen with multis at all innocent or not you are banned is NOT working! Don't be lazy do a real investigation not just go off 1 screenshot.
IP ADDRESS 86.97.230.169 - 3 PLAYER
IP ADDRESS 176.204.29.210 - 1-2 PLAYER
IP ADDRESS 86.97.230.169 - All 3 player suspended for 7 Days because they fleeting IP ADDRESS 176.204.29.210 for imperial quest or etc.If they're talking IP Location meaning only 3 player the same location/city?
We send ticket to clarify us on this issue but we don't get any reply until now so better you sail solo or maximum 3 player.
ISSA
Gila Garuda Admiral
Multi x5 or more is the reason why inequality was so dramatic.
There might be a few mistaken bans, but most of them were true multis. People who respect the TOS would support the 3x rule by not forming fleets of more than 3 members. There are cases where people may get help from others for sb, adventure, production, but 3x is enough (one helping two others simultaneously). I do not believe there are genuine cases when one person has to help 4 other individuals constantly.
Some may say two friends group together to nanban. Why not just split the fleet then? That way the two can actually run 6 ship loads without confusing GMs for catching true multis.
And I played this games for 7 years and know plenty of liars who claim they are friends of two / three, or brothers sisters etc. enough bs. People just want to take advantage to stay ahead the grinding.
And guess why do they need to grind and make ake the risk? Because Papaya reset the server!
Netmarble died due to their CEO selling gold and selling bugged forged cannons but refused to confiscate them. OGP died because of Coolwind. They didnt die because of banning multi. OGP’s hard stance on multi really worked. During the three year of their reigh i found very few multi x5, some but very few. Most people run multi x3, which was legal.
A game publisher looks at this problem from a macro view, in which a blanket ban of 5x is cheaper to implement and more effective to achieve the top priority goal of stopping illegal multi, than otherwise case by case ban.
There will be collateral damage, but it is acceptable because innocent people adapt by learning not to fleet for more than 3.
As much as how unfair it may seem to a persecuted individual, the ban is doing a greater good for the community, and therefore those individuals who happened to place themselves on the wrong side are acceptable sacrifice.
It is similar irl when a group of extremely dangerous terrorists hijacked an innocent child as meat shield, You reckon the military should just stop the strike so that those terrorists could hurt more people? For saving one life the community has to later lose a thousand.
If the military adopts a harsh standard by striking with or without meat shield, then terrorists wouldnt bother hijacking meat shields, and hence indirectly saving more people.
It seems to us that Family with 2 ip address will not be allowed to fleet together so we're going to split us and we already informed even our company members not to fleet more than 3 to ensure we will not get screenshot from those whining waiting in SEA/EA.
We share on this fourm all our issue to improve the game.
Kind regards,
Tine
Philippines Company